AI, Semiconductors, and the Return of Strategic Capital
The future of warfare, economic leadership, and industrial power hinges on two intertwined technologies: semiconductors and artificial intelligence. These aren't isolated industries—they're dual-use powerhouses that drive military dominance, energy security, and the backbone of digital infrastructure. The United States, once the unchallenged master of both, now faces a pivotal crisis. A bipartisan investigation by the U.S. House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party exposed a damning reality: top American venture capital firms—Sequoia Capital China, Walden International, GGV Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, and GSR Ventures—have funneled at least $3 billion into Chinese firms that propel the CCP's military buildup, surveillance state, and quest for tech hegemony.
This report outlines the national security peril of misaligned capital, redefines the semiconductor supply chain as vital infrastructure, and details AI Infrastructure Partners' approach to investing with unyielding sovereign purpose.
I. The CCP’s Technological Offensive: Capital as a Vector of Strategic Risk
The Select Committee's February 2024 report pulls no punches: U.S. capital hasn't merely fueled China’s AI and semiconductor surge—it has turbocharged the CCP’s capacity to turn these tools against America.
Sequoia Capital China alone poured at least $1.2 billion into ByteDance, a firm that brazenly partners with CCP propaganda and censorship machines, while also investing in AI outfits like 4Paradigm, which aids PLA human rights abuses.
Walden International dumped $50 million into SMIC, Beijing's premier military-tied foundry, and backed SJSemi post its addition to the U.S. Entity List.
GGV Capital funneled $180 million into Megvii, an AI surveillance giant blacklisted for Uyghur oppression, and Qualcomm Ventures backed SenseTime, another sanctioned entity enabling mass detention.
This wasn't passive funding. It came bundled with expertise: board seats, talent pipelines, IP transfers, and savvy navigation of U.S. regulations. As the Committee starkly warns, these VC firms operate "almost as consultants," embedding Chinese entities into global networks while dodging American safeguards.
LTG (ret) Ross Coffman cuts through the fog: "There are two common misconceptions when it comes to both China and the CCP. They will not self-contain during conflict to the South China Sea and they are absolutely focused on dominating each and every world market. "We're bankrolling the arsenal aimed at our throat. Let that sink in.
II. The Cost of Real Economic Capital
America, once celebrated for its market ingenuity, is now ensnared by its own financial wizardry. Our economic bedrock has eroded from tangible production to speculative bubbles. Stock repurchases and hype-driven valuations conceal stagnant wages, crumbling manufacturing, and fragile industrial foundations.
Years of offshoring for disinflation and debt-fueled highs yielded one brutal outcome: we traded our industrial core for bargain-bin imports and illusory wealth. We handed adversaries our dollars to fabricate the essentials of our society.
This isn't policy failure anymore. It's institutional decay.
Our system now favors asset inflation over real output. It crushes builders. We lionize vaporware startups while factories rust. Elite consumers guzzle $8 lattes as blue-collar heartlands spiral into permanent joblessness.
The cure isn't belt-tightening—it's realignment. Redirect capital to innovators, operators, and creators. Government must back productive lending, shoulder risks, and face facts: consumption on borrowed time isn't growth.
Fabs, foundries, and tooling aren't relics. They're the frontlines. We must endure the hits to revive a genuine economy—one hammered out by sweat, expertise, and grit.
III. Semiconductors as Strategic Infrastructure
Headlines obsess over 5nm nodes and mega-scale AI clusters, but that's surface-level. The deeper crisis is the capital-heavy semiconductor ecosystem—a hidden web on the brink of rupture.
From design software and gas systems to testing, packaging, and vacuum tech, this chain powers everything from precision munitions to medical devices. As Justin Weinstein of GlobalFoundries declares: "Without a secure supply chain of chips, we are truly jeopardizing the engine of our society."
No superpower outsources its silicon spine. We must fund the full stack—not just cutting-edge plants, but the materials, machinery, and processes that enable intelligent systems.
IV. Mature Nodes: The Overlooked Backbone of AI
The buzz is all H100 GPUs and 3nm tech. Reality check: AI crumbles without older silicon.
200mm fabs churning 180nm to 65nm chips are indispensable for power control, edge computing, robotics, sensors, and defense hardware. These are the unsung heroes—the wiring, stabilizers, and accelerators of AI.
The Bureau of Industry and Security's December 2024 assessment is alarming: Over two-thirds of U.S. products contain PRC-origin chips, yet half of surveyed firms couldn't verify if their supply chains include them.
China is ramping up mature-node production via massive subsidies, exerting pricing pressure that undercuts U.S. competitors and risks overcapacity floods.
It's predatory economics masquerading as policy. Chip failures cascade into systemic breakdowns.
Worse, most capacity is concentrated in Taiwan, China, and Japan. One East Asian flare-up, and America stalls.
V. Manufacturing: The Missing Middle Layer
U.S. industrial policy is lopsided—R&D at one extreme, flashy gadgets at the other. The core? Gutted.
Forty years of neglect: scant capital for packaging, thermal tech, or robotics lines. No talent funnels for precision work. Outcome? Utter reliance on overseas manufacturing.
This is where AI infrastructure materializes. Where scaling happens.
And where sovereignty is won or surrendered.
VI. From Passive Policy to Industrial Strategy
The CHIPS Act ignited progress, spurring over $450 billion in private investments across 80+ projects in 25 states by mid-2025.
But grants alone won't suffice. We need capital with an industrialist's mindset, not a trader's.
A bold strategy demands:
This isn't hype or speculation. It's steel, silicon, and sweat. Reclaiming power's foundations.
VII. Rebalancing Trade to Rebuild the Base
"Free trade" is a myth when it eviscerates your homeland.
We forfeited more than employment: process know-how, material mastery, integration skills. Our industrial DNA withered.
Time to wield trade as strategy, not dogma. That requires:
VIII. From Dependency to Dominance
Chart every AI chain vulnerability. Reshore exposures.
Build absent capabilities from scratch.
Leadership demands self-sufficiency in chip tools, RF/analog systems, automation, and chemicals. Dependency isn't risky—it's fatal.
IX. A New Era of American Industrial Sovereignty
Tomorrow's industry won't crown coders or consumers—but builders.
America retains the funds, brains, and drive to triumph. But trade must align with strategy. Ditch cheap import delusions: manufacturing is strategy, not sentiment.
AI Infrastructure Partners backs firms grasping this—producers scaling and safeguarding tomorrow's intelligence economy.
X. Aligning Policy with Strategic Capital Formation
The Select Committee nails it: U.S. outflows propel PRC aims while undermining ours.
We demand:
Finance must bolster liberty, not weakness.
XI. Intel Foundry: The Strategic Last Mile
Cut the euphemisms: Intel Foundry's collapse means U.S. forfeiture in advanced nodes. End of story.
TSMC/Samsung U.S. plants fall short—their R&D stays abroad, ceding roadmap control.
Amid 2025's turmoil—25,000 layoffs, retreats from Germany/Poland/Costa Rica, and new CEO Lip-Bu Tan's overhaul—Intel's revival is non-negotiable.
XII. Process Innovation Pulls the Ecosystem
Proximity counts. Domestic process tech attracts startups, chains, and talent.
Sever innovation from making and pay in exposure.
XIII. Workforce Reimagined
Intel's slashing seasoned talent—our prime asset in AI infrastructure.
Revolutionize tradecraft:
XIV. Strategic Imperatives
|
Objective |
Action Steps |
|
Anchor Process R&D in the U.S. |
Prioritize sub-2nm development via coordinated public-private investment |
|
Empower a U.S. Foundry Champion |
Recapitalize and restructure Intel Foundry to lead with national backing |
|
Build Domestic Ecosystem Clusters |
Co-locate startups, suppliers, research centers around U.S. fabs |
|
Elevate Advanced Manufacturing Trades |
Scale tradecraft curricula and certification pipelines for high-wage, high-skill jobs |
XV. Conclusion: Capital Strategy Is National Strategy
America can't safeguard democracy, fuel its economy, or steer tech with capital geared for apps and excess.
Build. Not software. But fabs. Foundries. Tools. Teams.
The peril is existential. Outsource your fate, and it's gone.
This isn't theory or trade. It's survival.
Act accordingly.
Works Cited
AI Infrastructure Partners. (2024). Internal analysis and strategic commentary on U.S. capital equipment, manufacturing resilience, and national industrial policy.
Bousquette, I. (2024, October). As AI matures, chip industry will look beyond GPUs, AMD chief says. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/as-ai-matures-chip-industry-will-look-beyond-gpus-amd-chief-says-fec6776a
Cave, D., et al. (2019, November). Mapping more of China’s tech giants: AI and surveillance. Australian Strategic Policy Institute. https://www.aspi.org.au/
Clark, D., & Swanson, A. (2023, January). U.S. pours money into chips, but even soaring spending has limits. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/01/technology/chips-act-semiconductors.html
Clark, D. (2021, July). The tech cold war’s ‘most complicated machine’ that's out of China’s reach. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/04/technology/asml-china-us-chip-ban.html
Congressional Research Service. (2020, October). Semiconductors: U.S. industry, global competition, and federal policy (CRS Report R46581). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46581
CSET – Center for Security and Emerging Technology. (2022–2023). Chinese AI companies and military-civil fusion. https://cset.georgetown.edu/
Doffman, Z. (2018, December). As the AI cold war looms, has time finally been called on China's spy industry? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2018/12/22/as-the-ai-cold-war-looms-has-time-finally-been-called-on-chinas-spy-industry/
Frank, J. (2024). Why 200mm fabs still matter in the AI age—and who’s leading the charge. AI Infrastructure Partners. https://aiipartners.ai/insights/200mm
Frank, J. (2024). Jason Frank – Experience Profile. AI Infrastructure Partners. (Internal executive profile)
Hagey, K., & Fitch, A. (2024, March). Sam Altman seeks trillions of dollars to reshape business of chips and AI. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/sam-altman-seeks-trillions-of-dollars-to-reshape-business-of-chips-and-ai-89ab3db0
Ioannou, L. (2020, September). A brewing U.S.-China tech cold war rattles the semiconductor industry. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/18/a-brewing-us-china-tech-cold-war-rattles-the-semiconductor-industry.html
Klayman, B., & Nellis, S. (2021, January). Trump's China tech war backfires on automakers as chips run short. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-autos-chips/trumps-china-tech-war-backfires-on-automakers-as-chips-run-short-idUSKBN29K1FQ
Meyer, D. (2018, November). U.S. urges other countries to shun Huawei, citing espionage risk. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2018/11/23/us-urges-other-countries-to-shun-huawei-citing-espionage-risk/
Ni, V. (2021, June). China denounces US Senate's $250bn move to boost tech and manufacturing. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun/09/china-denounces-us-senates-250bn-move-to-boost-tech-and-manufacturing
Pitler, D. (2024). The weight of capital [Unpublished op-ed]. AI Infrastructure Partners.
Sanger, D. E., & Edmondson, C. (2021, June). Senate poised to pass huge industrial policy bill to counter China. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/07/us/politics/senate-china-industrial-policy.html
Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party. (2024, February 8). The CCP’s investors: How American venture capital fuels the PRC military and human rights abuses. https://selectcommitteeonccp.house.gov/
The White House. (2021, February 24). Executive order on America’s supply chains.